Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Freedom of What Religion?



(Disclaimer: This newsletter is probably going to be very controversial in some circles. My intent is not to incite violence or to target any individuals, I am trying to enlighten and inform. I might add that I feel truly blessed to be able to convey this message to you because I live in the U.S.A. and not in Russia where those who disagree are once again being thrown into prisons for speaking out).

 “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” - First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Hey Folks,

I am sure those of you who follow faith based issues have seen how over the last few decades the Christian religion, the religion of a majority of our forefathers, has been constantly under attack by those who wish to control the conversation (among other things). Many of those attacking this religion use what they call the “Separation of Church and State” clause; however one would be hard pressed to find this clause in the Constitution or the Declaration of independence. If you confront these attackers about this they refer to the “establishment” clause. Now, if you read the First Amendment it does talk about making no law respecting an establishment of religion, which is where most of those attacking Christianity stop. What these people refuse to notice is that “Congress” shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the “Exercise” therof. It is Congress that has the limitations on it, not the religion. In the upside down world of “Political Correctness”, the prohibiting of the free exercise is rampant. Under President Obama and Obama Care, many religious organizations are required to go against their beliefs (their free exercise thereof) by providing for abortions and contraception. For years, these intolerant attackers have tore down crosses, stopped free speech if it was of a religious nature, forced religious institutions to hire those who do not hold their beliefs, filed lawsuit after lawsuit to “Prohibit The Free Exercise” of pretty much only two religions, Christianity and Judaism. It amazes me that two religions that pray for the whole of mankind, that believes we are all God’s children and worthy of redemption, who pray for the non-believers,  are told they are intolerant, while those attacking these religions are propping up and encouraging a religion that states in its holiest book that non-believers must be beheaded (Qur’an Sura (8:12) - I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.).

After Barack Obama was elected, and prior to, many were questioning what his religion was. Many stated, as he did, that he was a Christian. Many took him at his word and we found that he was a member of Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ. Not too many people questioned anything after that, but a few people noticed that his church taught Black Liberation Theology. Now I am all about keeping blacks liberated, however this theology is not based in the Bible but more socialist doctrines (Trinity United Church of Christ adopted the Black Value System written by the Manford Byrd Recognition Committee chaired by Vallmer Jordan in 1981). I won’t get too deep into this subject here because I would like to talk more about what a minority of people saw...Obama’s Muslim roots.

I do not think that Barack Obama is a Muslim; however I do think he does have a connection to Islam from his time in Indonesia. I do believe he admires the religion of his step father even if he does not follow it. For many who believe that he is a Muslim, the President has not done a lot to show that he is not. In his 3 years he went to Egypt and apologized for the U.S., He bowed to the Saudis (and many others), he celebrated Ramadan at the Capitol, he supported the overthrow of the Egyptian government by the Muslim Brotherhood (a terrorist group), he supported the overthrow of Libya by Al-Qaeda sympathizers, he has called for Israel to return to the indefensible borders of 1967, his administration leaked the plans of our allies (Israel) to the Iranians, he invited the head of the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House, and this is just a few of such things the President has done that seems to favor Islam. It is very easy to see why those who claim he is Muslim to believe that way. And to make things worse…The DNC will open with a Jummah! Oh, I’m sorry, what’s a Jummah? A Jummah is the Friday congregational prayers that all Muslims do…You know, when you hear the Muezzin (the guy singing from the tower) melodically singing “Allahu Akbar” it is time for the DNC…oops, time for Friday prayers to begin. I wonder why the “separation of Church and State” doesn’t apply here.  Perhaps this is why Obama claimed “we are not a Christian Nation”. The Blaze Article on the DNC Jummah
Now, I have written before about Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-harb before, but as a refresher; Dar-al-Islam is the house of Islam, Dar-al-harb is the house of war; these are the two houses that exist in Islam. Basically if you are not Muslim, you are of the house of war and therefore must be killed (refer to the previous Qur’anic Sura). The Islamic world is in a constant state of war because they are commanded to conquer the world for Allah. Now, this is not to say that All Muslims believe this way, however it is the belief of those that have declared us their enemy, which is millions.

So who is our enemy, Millions of radical Muslims ( if radical means following the teachings of one’s holy book). So if one were to apologize to this enemy, invite this enemy into our sacred halls, give vital information of those allied with us to this enemy,  give up our traditions for theirs, and pray as they do, I ask, is that giving aid and comfort to the enemy? Is this the “Fundamental Transformation” Obama was talking about?

 “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.” - U.S. Constitution Article Three

Can a President be accused of Treason? Is the United States the “President” or We The People? The issue here is to figure out if the actions of this administration are intentional or are these people really that naïve. I believe the latter is possible only due to the fact that these people believe they are so superior intellectually to those of us who see these things, that they dismiss anything we may say, even if it is the truth. Their arrogance is unsurpassed and unfortunately could be the downfall of us all.

Please Watch: Dishonorable Disclosures by Opsec Team  (opsecteam.org)

Please keep up to date with us on www.ThePeopleofLiberty.com , and please make sure everyone you know is registered to vote and does so this November. We cannot afford 4 more years of this! If you, yourselves decide not vote, please vote to protect our children and their children from the dangerous and  irrational policies of this Administration.

Mike

No comments:

Post a Comment